Thursday, April 30, 2009
Shattered
Piercing blue eyes swept the path, inconsequentially marking each trudging step. His thoughts swept away from him, intermingling with the deadness of the air, and then plunged back again, skirting the depths of his moody, teenage ego. What did he find in there? The hazy innocence of a youth not long past? A burgeoning intelligence that was out of place in this backwater town? The harsh rebellion of a persecuted soul? It was too soon to tell; his thoughts strayed back outside, expelled like the steamy breath seeping out of his upturned jacket collar.
“A couple of kids jumped me,” Adam says to me plainly, leaning back in his chair and rubbing his chin nostalgically. “One of them broke my jaw with a baseball bat. My jaw still pops from it.” Seated comfortably in his barren office, I continue to listen to his story:
Across the road, he saw the wide expanse of russet grass that someday soon would become a baseball field once again. Dead tree branches crackled in the woods behind him. Startled out of his reverie, Adam instinctively turned to see what was causing the commotion.
There was no time for fear, no time for defense. The two boys scurrying out of the trees were bigger than him, and one wielded a long, thin-handled aluminum bat. Did the bully have time to say something clever? Adam would have. He was a smartass, and that was what made him a target: “Batter up!”
The bat swept through the air in an untrained arc, finding its target almost by accident. Adam’s jawbone snapped violently out of its place; inside his skull, the afternoon sun shattered into a mist of dazzling lights that blinded him from the pain. His knees buckled momentarily, before recovering his body to its full, if not significant, height. Darkness never descended, so Adam was able to see the stunned look on his attacker’s face.
“I think he couldn’t even believe what had happened. It was almost like it surprised him, so much so that he just dropped the bat. So I picked it up.”
He could taste the blood now. It poured into his mouth, seeping between his teeth, where the pain was beginning to localize. The two bigger boys stood dumbfounded, rooted to the dirty, dead grass as if they had forgotten why they had come. Lunging for the fallen weapon, Adam gripped its plastic-wrapped handle tightly. Fear had come and gone; the hatred of the hunter was now made insignificant in the face of the blind fury of the hunted’s revenge. Swinging the bat like a lumberjack hewing a tree, Adam crushed the side of the assailant’s chest, perhaps breaking the first ribs in that first hack. The squeals of pain did not deter him; again, and once more the bat came down as the once-bully crumpled to the ground. As if awakening from a daze, his companion lurched forward, throwing Adam back from his fallen comrade. Losing his balance, Adam finally toppled over, the bat rolling away into the underbrush. The previous moments’ rage and hostility spiraled down, down into a pinpoint of suddenly crystal-clear rationality: I have to get up. I have to get away.
“I was brought up on charges, but the judge dropped them, obviously because the kid broke my jaw first. He still ordered me to see a juvi officer, who recommended that I find a more constructive outlet for my aggression.”
When he managed to regain his feet, there was no sign of the two other boys except the muddy patch where the grass had been torn up by the sprawled body of Adam’s attacker. Turning to hurry homeward, his intention all along, the needling pains in his teeth exploded into a fire that consumed his entire skull. His eyes dulled, his ears closed off, and each step sent a wave of anguish through his loosely-hanging mandible. Behind the pain, though, Adam’s sharp intellect was reawakening, questioning: ‘What have I done?’
Thursday, April 23, 2009
Small World
“So I have this assignment to do for my writing class,” I began, reeling off my pre-rehearsed spiel as she nodded sagaciously. Turns out she had taken a creative non-fiction writing class at St. Lawrence University, from which she graduated last year. Falling into easy conversation about her work, she struck me as exceedingly normal, the kind of person filling in the cracks in society between the weirdoes, degenerates, geniuses, and over-achievers. Her kindness did not seem to be rendered out of any sense of necessity or politeness, but came naturally as well.
“What is your last name?” I asked, feeling silly for having to ask my neighbor such a basic question. “Pestka,” she replied. Alarms of recognition sounded in my brain: “Are you related to Sherri and Don Pestka?” I inquired. “Yeah, they’re my parents.” Reddening, I couldn’t help but laugh. “They’re members at the gym where I work,” I explained, and she soon got to laughing herself. Despite the semi-dimness of her small nearly windowless apartment, I couldn’t help but feel that the entire room was filled with a warmth and comfort by this laugh, bouncing off the walls and filling the hallway where I leaned against the door frame. “What a small world,” she remarked. I couldn’t help but agree.
Wednesday, April 8, 2009
What They Don't... (Brevity)
When I am given the assignment to write a paper, I don’t instantly seek out the minimum page requirement; instead, I check to see if there is a maximum. When assignments like “Analyze Aristotle’s use of the term ‘Substance’ in Categories and Metaphysics in a 4-5 page essay” or “In a 5-7 page essay, explain John Donne’s use of metaphor in three of his ‘Holy Sonnets’” are given out by a professor, my stomach instinctually knots itself as I question internally whether they are really serious about that upper limit or not. I can’t help myself. The pages inevitably stack up: A one page “reading response” written about a poem of no more than twelve lines suddenly becomes a three page mini-treatise on the metaphors for race in the closing stanza or the use of assonance in lines five through nine.
Now I could blame my propensity for prolixity on genetics (my father is notoriously long-winded, but that’s a story for another day), but what seems to be the root cause for my lack of brevity is in fact a fear of being misunderstood. Having never had a speech impediment, nor suffered under the weight of any learning disability, such a fear seems to have sprung from nowhere. My pattern of thought has only recently been complicated to the point of near absurdity by virtue of the higher education system, but this is neither here nor there, as I should, by the same token, still be able to say what needs to be said. But that’s not how it is: superfluous clarifications, the laying on of detail after detail, and a knee-jerk impulse to make every list of characteristics into a perfect set of three means that, where others nail their points in one shot, my words circle the rim timorously for pages and pages. The question of whether or not I am making any sense inspires an anxious verbosity, just as perching at the edge of a high-dive compels my knees to turn to Jell-O. My fear’s manifestations are evident even now: as I write these brief comments, I find myself squirming to avoid the short, simple statements of fact that would have rendered a succinct and concise essay upon my fear of being incomprehensible.
It seems to me that most fears people have are at base reasonably motivated: a fear of spiders brought on by the possibility of coming in contact with a Brown Recluse, a dread of high places incited by an understanding of gravity and density, or even a fear of crossing bridges brought on by a unseemly (though at least partially warranted) distrust in civil engineering. My own trepidation at being misunderstood seems just as rational as these in some sense; people who have speech impediments or have trouble putting words to their thoughts must suffer from such misgivings as well, but at least in their case they have good reason. The reality of their situation is completely lost on me; why my own fear is still manifested in spite of accolades from professors and peers for the high quality and clarity of my writing is a mystery worth investigating. The discontinuity of it certainly gives one food for thought…but that’s a story for another day.
Thursday, April 2, 2009
Big
Where does one escape such heat? Once, when I was about ten years old, my family visited my aunt and uncle in Milwaukee on a day when the temperature soared above one hundred. There house being about as old as ours and similarly lacking in the modern Midwestern necessity of air-conditioning, we were forced to retreat, to the great delight of my older brother and I, to a Holiday Inn, where we all gathered around the blasting industrial AC unit before taking a swim in the four foot deep hotel pool. That night we dined on Pizza Hut, delivered right to our room, and my brother and I stayed up late watching a movie on TNT while my parents shared a few rounds of Milwaukee’s most famous export with my relatives in the next room.
In middle school, long after moving to Oregon, where the dry heat of the summers was laughable by comparison, I passed long afternoons at the local YMCA with my friend Sven, whose name fit his brilliant blue eyes and cool Nordic temperament. We share memories from that summer that most of the kids I went to school with do: doing cannonballs into the deep end of the YMCA’s pool, carrying the ten pound rubber diving brick up from the bottom, testing to see how long we could sit beneath the ten feet of highly chlorinated water, all in the hour and a half each afternoon that that pool was deserted before an onslaught of young day-campers drove us out at 3:00. Our trips to the pool weren’t so much about getting out of the heat, as about not letting ourselves stew in the doldrums of an unstructured summer vacation. The years passed and our interests and circles of influence grew apart; Sven and I were never closer than in those many weeks in which we rode our bikes to the Y, stopping at a convenience store and buying up a few bucks’ worth of candy or ice cream on the way home.
I can’t deny the effect of the American movie industry upon my summer habits either. The “Summer Blockbuster” has been a staple in Hollywood for years, as the producers of these films reason that many people (especially those without air-conditioning in their homes) would seek refuge at their local cinema. The cool breeze billowing from the wall ducts is often more amenable to the fancy of movie-goers in the summertime than the films themselves.
The day I was born, June 3, 1988, the movie “Big” premiered to great critical acclaim and audience appeal. I would only come to know it from its presentation on TV, where “Big” has found its home on AMC in amongst the black and white Westerns and slap-stick comedies of the thirties and forties. The movie stars Tom Hanks, before his rise to superstardom with “Philadelphia Story” and “Forrest Gump,” and David Moscow, whose participation in the Disney musical “Newsies” had already made him familiar to me, as I had, by the age of seven or eight, seen that movie enough times to have every word in the script and every lyric in the songs memorized (by the accounts of others of my age, such an obsession was not uncommon). “Big” tells a story of a boy who wishes he could be big, grown-up, no longer subjected to the trials and tribulations of pre-teen adolescence. The next morning he wakes to find his outward appearance has been changed to that of thirty-year-old Tom Hanks, but he is still the same twelve-year-old boy on the inside. Hilarity ensues as he tries to navigate the adult world with the mentality of a kid, experiencing the pressures of work and his first romantic encounter with a woman. According to IMDB, the director first shot the entire movie with the young David Moscow performing Hanks’s entire role in order that the older actor could inhabit an accurate portrayal of his “younger self” in the real movie. What emerged from this was a great performance that really got to the heart of what it means to be a kid and what it means to be an adult.
Now, when I visit family, I don’t head into the next room to play with my cousins, or simply sit and watch TV while devouring Pizza Hut. I hardly ever go to the pool, except occasionally to swim laps when I’m feeling guilty about my eating habits. Summers are characterized by tedious work. As the unavoidable onrush of time has swept me up and carried me from that incubator of a house on Minnehaha Ave in St. Paul to the hallowed halls of Pacific University, I can’t help but feel that I, like Josh Baskin in “Big,” would choose to go back to being twelve if given the opportunity. While it would seem fair to sit back and marvel at my present condition, would it not be even more marvelous to go back and enjoy it once again?
Sources: IMDB, “GRAPHICAL CLIMATOLOGY OF MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL AREA TEMPERATURES, PRECIPITATION, AND SNOWFALL (1820-PRESENT)” by Charles Fisk < http://home.att.net/~minn_climo/>
Thursday, March 19, 2009
Thingamajig
I don’t remember exactly when, but sometime around the end of middle school my father presented me with a small, rectangular box, about twice as long as it was wide, with a bowed strip of linoleum somehow affixed to the inside of the wooden frame. To my adolescent mind it looked like a somewhat flattened half-pipe, the kind I saw Tony Hawk and Bob Burnquist skateboarding on every August during the X Games, only instead of the bland plywood of a skate ramp, flecks of gold sparkled in the faded cream band of flooring.
“What is it for?” I asked my dad, turning the thing over in my hands and examining its green felt-covered base. “You put your spare change in it. That way it’s easier to pick up,” he sagely replied. I rolled the box back over, setting it down on my dresser soundlessly, eyeing it once again, this time with its purpose in mind. It dawned on me as my dad reached into his pocket and drew out a couple of coins, placing them at the nadir of the linoleum half-pipe. “See,” he said, sliding the coins up the smooth sides to the edge, where they leapt into the waiting palm of his other hand. “Cool,” I drawled out, not unimpressed by the demonstration. “Yeah, your great-grandpa Sayers made it. He kept it on his dresser his whole life,” my dad said, loosing himself in a reverie while I gathered up the loose change scattered around my room in bottles and jars and oddly shaped banks (I’ve never owned a piggy bank; the closest thing to it is the miniature Red Cross ambulance with a coin slot in its roof that my grandfather gave me when I was little). As I began to load up the thingamajig with change, I couldn’t help but slide a few coins up the side, over the edge, and into my soft, child’s palm.
My great-grandfather Sayers (my grandmother’s father) was a farmer, with hard, coarse fingers that put in countless days in the humid Illinois summers plowing cornfields and sowing soybean crops. His family lived in a big two-story house, shaded to the north by the thick forest of oak and walnut trees that seems to sprout from the Rock River, a thick and luscious island of timber in a sea of rolling farmland. During the Great Depression, great-grandpa Sayers was able to whether the tough economic times by maintaining a vast acreage at minimal costs, generating maximum profit. My dad likes to say that my great-grandfather never bought any equipment new: his tractor was well beyond its prime, his plow was used, and he supposedly built a combine out of nothing more than a pile of spare parts and a diagram. Earl Sayers was above all things ingenious and innovative, able to repair the seemingly irreparable with junkyard parts and the boxes upon boxes of spare nuts and bolts he’d salvaged or saved from the discard pile at the steel mill across the river. Farming was a family affair, my great uncle Bud putting in long days in the fields, my dad and uncle spending their childhood fishing for hoses or rebar in the remains of what was once a dump not far from the property. My great-grandfather died in 1985, three years before I was born, victim of the cholesterol-ridden bacon, egg, and pancake breakfasts that fueled his day’s work, the pot-roast and mashed potato dinners, the thick, smelly cigars that were his favorite luxury. While he took to his grave his own love of economy and ingenuity, great-grandpa Sayers left the legacy of these values in his progeny. And in that thingamajig.
I’d be lying if I said that every time I slide a couple of nickels up the gold-flecked linoleum ramp I think about its maker. The simple genius of this small, convenient object I often taken for granted, its virtues no longer celebrated, but instead simply expected. Yet when I stop and think about it, I can’t help but picture a devilish smile, a cunning wink, a rightfully-exhibited pride on my great-grandfather’s face as he presents and demonstrates his invention. The sheer cleverness and quality of craftsmanship evident in this amalgamation of scrap is worthy of praise, as is the man who identified a problem and saw the potential for solving it in these diverse components.
Where have these men gone? It seems as though there is something ready-made for every situation, that innovation is relegated to gray-walled, low-ceilinged R & D departments at Sony, or Apple, or Brookstone. There are no “thingamajigs,” only “coin keepers,” pre-fabbed in particle board, or, for the high-end customer, plated with brushed nickel, available for $24.95 in the “crap-you-don’t-really-need-and-shouldn’t-really-be-spending-your-money-on-anyway” section of your local department store. Most of us would rather choose to live without something that makes gathering up our spare change easier than shell out for a little convenience (besides, who even carries coins around anymore?). But that’s not what really matters about great-grandpa Sayers’ linoleum coin ramp; what’s important about this family heirloom is not its usefulness, or even its role as an heirloom. In the end, the spirit of ingenuity, the desire and, above all, the ability to create solutions with the sweat of one’s brow, the skill of one’s touch, and the strength of one’s muscles, is what really counts. Disassociating oneself from the world by walling off problems with newfangled gadgets and excuses can never fulfill one quite like grabbing hold of a situation and contending with it. It’s not easy; hell, it’ll probably never be easy, but “easy” and “right” are often to very different things.
Wednesday, March 11, 2009
Truth in Advertising
The field of advertising has always fascinated me because of its seemingly ambiguous nature. Whenever you see or hear an advertisement for a given product, you never get the whole truth; a company peddling its wares isn’t about to come right out and tell you all the possible flaws, the poor labor practices, or the more cost-effective alternatives to its merchandise. No, all that you’ll get from an ad is a laundry list of amazing advantages that you can experience when you make one of these things your own. The best kinds of advertisements can convey these benefits without bashing you over the head with them, instead subtly weaving them into an entertaining façade made of some snappy one-liners or an adorable cartoon. An ad for a diamond store would never come right out and say “Diamonds: that’ll shut her up,” even if their target audience is men seeking to subdue their over-talkative wives
Advertising is really nothing more than a condensed version of what we literary types call “Creative Non-Fiction.” Advertisers seek to convey truthful information to their audience in creative way in order to convince them to use a given service or buy a certain product. They need to be witty and artistic comes from the goal of being memorable: when Joe Six-Pack is standing in the beer aisle at the grocery store trying to make a decision, he’s probably going to rely at least in part upon the commercials he saw during last week’s Sunday Night Football game. Making sure that it is your advertisement that Joe remembers is the main goal of the creative process, because in the end, Budweiser and Miller taste pretty much the same.
When a writer sits down to create a memoir, or a personal essay, or to write a biography, they have a multitude of facts on hand from which they can pick and choose to craft a story with a very specific message. In order to keep the reader engaged and the story interesting, the writer might choose some quirky details that are not rely relevant to the central theme, but are good for at least a chuckle. However, in creating a piece of non-fiction, there is one single unbreakable rule: the story begins in reality. Whatever the author writes, they cannot forget that in order to qualify as non-fiction, their piece of writing has to be a truthful account of what really happened.
Of course, there are those that would argue that truth is relative, that in any given situation each person can glean their own version of truth based on their perspective. In this sense, what’s really “true” is incredibly hard to pin down: is there some single, perfect, universal version of the event that transpired that any person can understand? Or is it simply that whatever happens can only be known based upon each individual’s experience of it?
This question is simply too big to say one way or the other whether or not TRUTH (perfect, universal) exists in all cases; however, when it comes to writing a non-fiction story about one’s own personal experience, then truth is in fact subjective. The facts and details the writer has at their disposal is their own memory, and even if they choose to consult other participants in a given experience, they are still going to judge the validity of those peoples’ accounts based upon their own interpretation of what happened.
Advertising is ambiguous for this very reason: the truth that they want to convey to the average consumer is very subjective. Sure, there are a few fail-safes for the consumer: they can always buy whatever was advertised and find out it’s not all it’s cracked up to be, or word could come out through some thorough journalistic work that the product contains lead or was made by eight year-olds in Singaporean sweatshop. However, the majority of the time you’ve got to buy it before you find out its broken.
We have to put our trust in advertising, though, because how else are we supposed to find out anything about a given product? The FDA and Consumer Safety Boards can mandate types of labels all they want, but in the end it’s up to the companies to provide us with the full truth about their merchandise, something they may not really want to do, just as some writers are not ready to be entirely honest about their experiences. In either case, it is the spirit with which the author approaches a work that makes all the difference: if they are honestly endeavoring to provide something as close to (big T) Truth as they can manage, then we may let a few errors of memory slide. However, if the author is lax in their adherence to Truth, deliberately trying to skew their subject even from their own truthful memory, then they can hardly call themselves a creator of non-fiction.
Thursday, February 26, 2009
White Noise (Bus Terminal, O'Hare International Airport)
“Where is the bus to
The woman behind the desk had drawn out the day’s paper, the local section, and sat back in her swivel chair scanning the front page. There was something so familiar in the glazed look she had, the way she seemed to recline completely out of her workspace and fall back into the depths of her own concerns. She paused, coming out of her reverie to fold back the page, and then slouched back against the worn plastic backrest. Other customers came up to her, talking in hushed tones about when the next buses would be coming and going; the lady behind the counter would lean in and listen attentively, answering their questions over and over again: “Yes, I’ll make an announcement when your bus arrives,” “I’ll make an announcement when that bus is here,” “Yes, I’ll make an announcement.” In between, she would fade back into herself, carefully folding the paper back into its proper shape once she’d finished reading it, her fingers doing the work while her soul strayed.
A few paces away another young black woman was mopping the floors in the entryway between two sets of sliding glass doors. When she finished a section, she would pick up the yellow “caution: wet floor” sign standing near the doors and swing it back and forth, fanning the newly-clean floors dry. With each drop, the two halves of the sign would clack together, announcing the nadir of each swing with a sharp crack! In a calm, steady rhythm, she fanned the floor, each snap following in the drudgery this woman’s entire form seemed to embody. Back and forth she walked, clacking her sign, drying the floor, pausing indignantly when a traveler would pass through the doors, causing her to break her tuneful toil. I couldn’t help but think of the Christmas carol “Sleigh Ride,” as the sounds of the bus terminal jingled along punctuated by the whip-crack of the cleaning woman’s “wet floor” sign.
The woman behind the desk made her announcement: “Bus 572 to
